The European Commission has been asking for feedback from the 6th of January to the 3rd of February to shape its “European Open Digital Ecosystem Strategy”. In our submission we stress that it is important to understand that Free and Open-Source Software (FOSS) * is the backbone of our digital infrastructure; * is a global and collaborative phenomenon and that isolating it along geographic boundaries is counterproductive; * has to be understood as a symbiotic ecosystem of diverse players (businesses, public administrations, foundations, academic institutions, and individual contributors) rather than “just” an economic sector/industry; * has a variety of strategic and practical benefits over proprietary software solutions and should therefore be adopted widely by European institutions. If you’re interested in the topic, we can also recommend you to read the submissions of the Free Software Foundation Europe and the OSI Europe Foundation. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Internet Society (ISOC) Switzerland Chapter is a non-profit organization that engages on a variety of Internet-related topics, ensuring that it is a place of possibility, opportunity, and progress that benefits people worldwide. We provide technically-grounded advice, policy recommendations, and educational material regarding privacy, security, Free and Open-Source Software, and digital sovereignty. We also organize informative events and debates like the annual Public Policy Sessions and participate in collaborative research projects like the NGI0 Commons Fund. As a national chapter of the international organization responsible for the .org domain, ISOC CH acts as a gateway between Switzerland and the international digital civil society. You can consider becoming a member (through the main ISOC web site) following the instructions at https://isoc.ch/membership, or just subscribe to our newsletter (2-3 announcements per year) by sending a message to contact@isoc.ch. The post Our submission to the EU Call for Evidence on the “European Open Digital Ecosystem Strategy” appeared first on ISOC Switzerland Chapter.

On the 18th of November 2025 two conferences in two European capitals simultaneously discussed issues pertaining to the buzzword of digital sovereignty: the DINAcon in Bern, Switzerland and the European Digital Sovereignty Summit in Berlin, Germany. Despite addressing similar topics, the conferences could not have been more different in content, however: While Swiss administrators used the DINAcon to present their implementation efforts with respect to the free and open-source software and interoperability requirements outlined in articles 9 and 14 of the EMBAG law, respectively, the European governments represented in the European Council pitched a very different vision of digital sovereignty in Berlin: One which emphasizes the competitiveness of and investment into proprietary European software solutions, most likely at the expense of consumer protections. We, as the Switzerland Chapter of the Internet Society (ISOC-CH), are very concerned about the commercial re-interpretation of the term digital sovereignty. While supporting local businesses to develop and administer digital solutions is an essential part of the equation to achieve digital sovereignty, it must not come at the cost of jeopardizing the ability of states to act independently now and in the future. The reaction to an outsized dependency on (state-sponsored) American and Chinese Big Tech firms cannot possibly be an outsized dependency on (state-sponsored) European or Swiss Big Tech companies. Apart from ignoring the fact that companies can change domiciles, be bought by foreign investors or go bankrupt, the “buy European” approach also showcases a lack of creativity and imaginative power on the part of European politicians who cannot fathom an alternative to emulating other global powers and reveals a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of technological dependencies: The fact that a software vendor or cloud computing provider is domestic does nothing to reduce the vendor lock-in effects, the restrictiveness of proprietary software licenses, and the resulting stifling of competition and innovation. Simply procuring digital services domestically falls massively short of achieving digital sovereignty as defined by either the Swiss (with a narrow focus on the state) or European (with a wider perspective including non-state actors) regulators: > “Digital sovereignty requires the necessary control over and ability to act in > the digital realm to ensure the delivery of state services.” – own translation > of the Swiss government’s definition of digital sovereignty > “Digital sovereignty is the ability of Member States to be able to regulate > their digital infrastructure, data and technologies. It encompasses the > ability of individuals, businesses and institutions in Europe to act > independently in the digital world, allowing for autonomous decisions about > the use, governance, and development of digital systems without undue reliance > on external actors […].” – taken from the Declaration for European Digital > Sovereignty A more encompassing answer as to how ensure digital sovereignty is needed. Any entity which wants to have control over the digital services it uses and aims to be able to change them to serve its specific needs should strive to operationalize the following principles: * local infrastructure: Having access to geographically local computing resources, network infrastructure, and electricity is a prerequisite for being able to exert control over one’s digital services. * local expertise: Without a motivated, experienced and educated local work force who can develop, debug and deploy digital services one cannot truly operate in a self-sovereign manner. * interoperability: Open standards and open data formats allow for connectivity between services and reduced switching costs, thereby preventing vendor lock-ins and increasing one’s agency. * free and open-source software: The four freedoms of free and open-source software (use, change, share and improve) give a legal and technical guarantee to the user to be a self-determined actor rather than a disenfranchised consumer. Instead of paying lip service to free and open-source software like the European Declaration for Digital Sovereignty does by making it optional and conditional, > “Open-source solutions can play an important role enhancing digital > sovereignty, > provided they meet high cybersecurity standards and are complemented by > reliable proprietary technologies where appropriate.” policy makers should recognize that actual digital sovereignty cannot be achieved without a firm commitment to free and open-source software. Operationalizing these criteria is obviously harder than simply procuring domestic digital products. It requires new capabilities, organizational structures and cultural changes. But unlike the simplistic “buy domestic” strategy – whose political appeal in times of economic and geopolitical turmoil is obvious – they actually provide a path to achieve what the Declaration for European Digital Sovereignty sets out as a goal: ensuring “the ability of individuals, businesses and institutions in Europe to act independently in the digital world”. As an NGI-0 consortium member, ISOC-CH will continue highlighting the advantages of free and open-source software, open standards, and open data formats for attaining digital sovereignty to policy makers, administrators, educators, and the wider public. We are happy to support Swiss decision makers on municipal, cantonal and federal levels with our expertise and network to take steps towards true digital sovereignty together. The post The state of discussions on digital sovereignty in Switzerland and Europe appeared first on ISOC Switzerland Chapter.

From 7th to 8th of November over 1,000 programmers, activists, academics and business leaders have gathered in Bolzano, South Tyrol, Italy for the 25th edition of the South-Tyrol Software Freedom Conference (SFSCON). Given the huge dependency of European businesses and administrations on American Big Tech companies, which the current US administration is not hesitant to use as leverage in international relations, Digital Sovereignty has been one of the key topics1 of the conference. Discussions ranged from how Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) can make communities resilient in times of crises, efforts to put existing interoperability requirements into practice, how Free Software communities can assist policy makers in switching to FOSS, to funding opportunities for Free Software by means of * regulatory requirements of the European Union’s Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), * effective public procurement policies which favor Free Software while preventing open washing, or * direct public investments into innovative ecosystems. In addition to attending the informative conference talks, we’ve used the opportunity to connect with our fellow NGI Zero consortium members from OW2 and FSFE, who were both present with booths at the conference, and discuss recent European developments in the realm of Free Software like the upcoming Digital Commons European Digital Infrastructure Consortium (DC-EDIC) and what one can expect from them. Our main takeaway from this year’s SFSCON is a somewhat surprising concurrency of encouraging and discouraging developments in Europe when it comes to the role of Free Software: On the one hand European institutions cut funding for important and successful FOSS projects and increase their dependency on US Big Tech in, e.g., schools, while at the same time making provisions for Free Software in landmark legislation like the CRA or institutionalizing FOSS efforts in, e.g., the European Open Source Academy or the aforementioned Digital Commons DC-EDIC. This situation shows that there is more advocacy work to be done to realize the full potential FOSS offers to achieve Digital Sovereignty. The (unfortunate) fact that we were the, to our knowledge, only Swiss organization at the conference is symptomatic of the – with few laudable exceptions – low importance Swiss policy makers and businesses assign to FOSS. We’re convinced that Swiss administrations, businesses and society at large would stand to benefit from engaging with and learning from the experiences our neighbors make with Free Software. 1. The others being: Health, Engineering, Cybersecurity, Open Hardware, Automation, Fediverse, Skills & Training, Culture, Data Spaces, Community Building. ︎ The post SFSCON 2025: The ever-growing importance of Free Software appeared first on ISOC Switzerland Chapter.